These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19123710)

  • 1. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
    Alcan T; Ceylanoğlu C; Baysal B
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 19123710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions.
    Cesur MG; Omurlu IK; Ozer T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1175-1181. PubMed ID: 29072243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of digital dental models from cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions according to time elapsed after the impressions.
    Lee SM; Hou Y; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 26827986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical evaluation of the agar alginate combined impression: dimensional accuracy of dies by new master crown technique.
    Ratnaweera PM; Yoshida K; Miura H; Kohta A; Tsuchihira K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Sep; 50(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15074361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination.
    Chandran DT; Jagger DC; Jagger RG; Barbour ME
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 21084736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud.
    Kim SR; Lee WS; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):835-40. PubMed ID: 26632232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptation of finger-smoothed irreversible hydrocolloid to impression surfaces.
    Lim PF; Neo KH; Sitoh L; Yeo KL; Stokes A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7575961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Studies on the use of alginate impression material and the dependence of the impression result on various conditions of processing. 3. Dimensional accuracy].
    Welker D
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Jun; 24(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 4605968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An analysis of the persistent presence of opportunistic pathogens on patient-derived dental impressions and gypsum casts.
    Egusa H; Watamoto T; Abe K; Kobayashi M; Kaneda Y; Ashida S; Matsumoto T; Yatani H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18350950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.