323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19123719)
1. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography.
Hilgers ML; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 16360924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans.
Gribel BF; Gribel MN; Frazäo DC; McNamara JA; Manzi FR
Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 20936951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography measurements: Influence of head orientation.
El-Beialy AR; Fayed MS; El-Bialy AM; Mostafa YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 21803252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
