101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19123737)
1. Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology.
Pinco J; Goulart RA; Otis CN; Garb J; Pantanowitz L
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jan; 133(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 19123737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Static Telecytology for Quality Assessment Purposes in the Evaluation of Cervical Smears Prepared by Means of Liquid-Based Cytology.
Archondakis S; Roma M; Kaladelfou E
Telemed J E Health; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1522-1525. PubMed ID: 32167860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of static telecytological diagnoses' reproducibility in cervical smears prepared by means of liquid-based cytology.
Tsilalis T; Archondakis S; Meristoudis C; Margari N; Pouliakis A; Skagias L; Panayiotides I; Karakitsos P
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):516-20. PubMed ID: 22856666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs.
Lee ES; Kim IS; Choi JS; Yeom BW; Kim HK; Han JH; Lee MS; Leong AS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 12645336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears in a quality assurance program: the Georgian experience.
Kldiashvili E; Schrader T
Telemed J E Health; 2011 Sep; 17(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 21851161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation and evaluation of a national external quality control program for cervical cytology in Mexico.
Flisser A; García-Malo F; Canepa Mde L; Doncel S; Espinoza R; Moreno R; Avila I; Pérez-Palacios G; Tapia-Conyer R; de la Fuente JR
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 12389486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Candida--fungal-induced atypia and proficiency testing: observations from the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program.
Moriarty AT; Darragh TM; Fatheree LA; Souers R; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Aug; 133(8):1272-5. PubMed ID: 19653724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolaou tests.
Marchevsky AM; Wan Y; Thomas P; Krishnan L; Evans-Simon H; Haber H
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Oct; 127(10):1320-4. PubMed ID: 14521463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of digital images to evaluate the interobserver agreement on cervical smear readings in Italian cervical cancer screening.
Tinacci G; Biggeri A; Pellegrini A; Cariaggi MP; Schiboni ML; Confortini M
Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 20482719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Global manipulation of digital images can lead to variation in cytological diagnosis.
Prasad H; Wanjari S; Parwani R
J Pathol Inform; 2011 Mar; 2():20. PubMed ID: 21572507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Renshaw AA; Young NA; Birdsong GG; Styer PE; Davey DD; Mody DR; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 128(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14692817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of microscope-based scanning software (Panoptiq) for the interpretation of cervicovaginal cytology specimens.
Groen R; Abe K; Yoon HS; Li Z; Shen R; Yoshikawa A; Nitanda T; Shimizu Y; Otsuka I; Fukuoka J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Dec; 125(12):918-925. PubMed ID: 28960858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CytoView. A prototype computer image-based Papanicolaou smear proficiency test.
Taylor RN; Gagnon M; Lange J; Lee T; Draut R; Kujawski E
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(6):1045-51. PubMed ID: 10578977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole Slide Imaging of Pap Cell Block Preparations versus Liquid-Based Thin-Layer Cervical Cytology: A Comparative Study Evaluating the Detection of Organisms and Nonneoplastic Findings.
Tawfik O; Davis M; Dillon S; Tawfik L; Diaz FJ; Fan F
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 25033897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic concordance in gynecologic cytology].
Lazcano Ponce EC; de Ruiz PA; Martínez Arias C; Murguía Riechers L
Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9380963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion? Concordance Between the Interpretation of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Papanicolaou Tests: Results From the College of American Pathologists PAP Education Program.
Crothers BA; Ghofrani M; Zhao C; Dodd LG; Goodrich K; Husain M; Kurtycz DFI; Russell DK; Shen RZ; Souers RJ; Staats PN; Tabatabai ZL; Witt BL; Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Jan; 143(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 30133317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based Papanicolaou smears without a transformation zone component: should clinicians worry?
Baer A; Kiviat NB; Kulasingam S; Mao C; Kuypers J; Koutsky LA
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 99(6):1053-9. PubMed ID: 12052599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
