BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19124117)

  • 21. Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances.
    Borghi AM; Riggio L
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():117-28. PubMed ID: 19073156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision.
    González-Alvarez C; Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 17470239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: a TMS approach.
    Cohen NR; Cross ES; Tunik E; Grafton ST; Culham JC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19168086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp.
    Umilta MA; Brochier T; Spinks RL; Lemon RN
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul; 98(1):488-501. PubMed ID: 17329624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Context and hand posture modulate the neural dynamics of tool-object perception.
    Natraj N; Poole V; Mizelle JC; Flumini A; Borghi AM; Wheaton LA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 23261936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Context effects on the processing of action-relevant object features.
    Girardi G; Lindemann O; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 20364922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.
    Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perseveration and contrast effects in grasping.
    Dixon P; Glover S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1578-84. PubMed ID: 19162049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?
    Creem-Regehr SH; Lee JN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):457-69. PubMed ID: 15722215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task.
    Cant JS; Westwood DA; Valyear KF; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):216-26. PubMed ID: 15707906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The planning of a sequence of saccades in pro- and antisaccade tasks: influence of visual integration time and concurrent motor processing.
    Lavergne L; Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Orriols E; Doré-Mazars K
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():82-95. PubMed ID: 18929544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual adaptation to goal-directed hand actions.
    Barraclough NE; Keith RH; Xiao D; Oram MW; Perrett DI
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1806-20. PubMed ID: 18855549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping.
    Craighero L; Bonetti F; Massarenti L; Canto R; Fabbri Destro M; Fadiga L
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 18394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis.
    Crajé C; van der Kamp J; Steenbergen B
    Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 1261():54-64. PubMed ID: 19401180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
    Wühr P; Elsner B
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planning of reach-and-grasp movements: effects of validity and type of object information.
    Loukopoulos LD; Engelbrecht SF; Berthier NE
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Sep; 33(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 11495830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge.
    Netelenbos N; Gonzalez CL
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Feb; 93():18-25. PubMed ID: 25483823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Affordance effects in grasping actions for graspable objects: electromyographic reaction time study.
    Suzuki T; Takagi M; Sugawara K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23409599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visuo-olfactory integration during action observation and execution of reach-to-grasp movements.
    Parma V; Zanatto D; Castiello U
    Neuroreport; 2013 Oct; 24(14):768-72. PubMed ID: 23839303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.