These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19124562)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
    Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Reducing Abdominal Compression during Prone CT Colonography on Ascending Colonic Rotation during Supine-to-Prone Positional Change.
    Jang JK; Park SH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: pilot study.
    Li P; Napel S; Acar B; Paik DS; Jeffrey RB; Beaulieu CF
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2912-23. PubMed ID: 15543800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography.
    Suh JW; Wyatt CL
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.
    Pickhardt PJ; Bakke J; Kuo J; Robbins JB; Lubner MG; del Rio AM; Kim DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W623-8. PubMed ID: 25415727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
    Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images.
    Song Y; Lee H; Kang HC; Shin J; Hong GS; Park SH; Lee J; Shin YG
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jan; 80():124-136. PubMed ID: 27936413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions.
    Chen SC; Lu DS; Hecht JR; Kadell BM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography.
    Laks S; Macari M; Bini EJ
    Radiology; 2004 Jun; 231(3):761-6. PubMed ID: 15163817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography.
    Roth HR; McClelland JR; Boone DJ; Modat M; Cardoso MJ; Hampshire TE; Hu M; Punwani S; Ourselin S; Slabaugh GG; Halligan S; Hawkes DJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3077-89. PubMed ID: 21815381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
    Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
    Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.
    Kim JY; Park SH; Lee SS; Kim AY; Ha HK
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Feb; 21(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 20711732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.
    Gryspeerdt SS; Herman MJ; Baekelandt MA; van Holsbeeck BG; Lefere PA
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 14986055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient computerized polyp detection for CT colonography.
    Li H; Pineau B; Santago P
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Mar; 18(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 15645333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of automated matching of supine and prone CT-colonography examinations.
    de Vries AH; Truyen R; van der Peijl J; Florie J; van Gelder RE; Gerritsen F; Stoker J
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Sep; 79(945):740-4. PubMed ID: 16641418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon.
    Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; Keogan MT; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Raptopoulos V
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 11870464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography.
    Michel SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Taylor AJ
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 17825740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.
    Wei Z; Yao J; Wang S; Liu J; Dwyer AJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nowinski WL; Summers RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):W50-8. PubMed ID: 24370165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degree of colonic distension: intrapatient comparison between CT colonography and CT with water enema.
    Revelli M; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Furnari M; Paparo F; Scopelliti L; Rosenberg I; Rollandi GA
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 27133680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated centerline for computed tomography colonography.
    Iordanescu G; Summers RM
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):1291-301. PubMed ID: 14626304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.