126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19125036)
1. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Narne VK; Vanaja CS
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 19125036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of envelope enhancement on speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Narne VK; Vanaja CS
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 18091107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of speech with envelope enhancement in individuals with auditory neuropathy and simulated loss of temporal modulation processing.
Narne VK; Vanaja CS
Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):700-7. PubMed ID: 19626513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the new Clarion speech processor 1.2 in quiet and in noise.
Battmer RD; Feldmeier I; Kohlenberg A; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S144-6. PubMed ID: 9391637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.
Wong PC; Uppunda AK; Parrish TB; Dhar S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):1026-41. PubMed ID: 18658069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of postcochlear implantation speech scores in an adult population.
Bodmer D; Shipp DB; Ostroff JM; Ng AH; Stewart S; Chen JM; Nedzelski JM
Laryngoscope; 2007 Aug; 117(8):1408-11. PubMed ID: 17585277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinctive features for short-term memory of consonants in noise.
Danhauer JL; Rastatter MP; Herman G
J Aud Res; 1978 Jan; 18(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 738988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
