202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19125243)
21. Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?
van Rijn RR; Lequin MH; Robben SG; Hop WC; van Kuijk C
Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Oct; 31(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 11685448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method.
Booz C; Yel I; Wichmann JL; Boettger S; Al Kamali A; Albrecht MH; Martin SS; Lenga L; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Cavallaro M; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 31993795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Different Bone Age Methods and Chronological Age in Prediction of Remaining Growth Around the Knee.
Breen AB; Steen H; Pripp A; Hvid I; Horn J
J Pediatr Orthop; 2023 Jul; 43(6):386-391. PubMed ID: 36941111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone age assessment: the applicability of the Greulich-Pyle method in eastern Turkish children.
Cantekin K; Celikoglu M; Miloglu O; Dane A; Erdem A
J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 22211856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas to assess skeletal age for four ethnic groups.
Mansourvar M; Ismail MA; Raj RG; Kareem SA; Aik S; Gunalan R; Antony CD
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Feb; 22():26-9. PubMed ID: 24485416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone age assessment: Large-scale comparison of Greulich-Pyle method and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 method for Taiwanese children.
Yuh YS; Chou TY; Tung TH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Feb; 86(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 36652571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The reliability of the Greulich-Pyle method in bone age determination among Australian children.
Paxton ML; Lamont AC; Stillwell AP
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2013 Feb; 57(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23374549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children.
Alshamrani K; Offiah AC
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):504-513. PubMed ID: 31372785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of Automated Bone Age for Critical Growth Assessment.
Khan KM; Gonzalez-Bolanos MT; Holm T; Miller BS; Sarafoglou K
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2015 Oct; 54(11):1038-43. PubMed ID: 25669921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of skeletal maturity score for Korean children and the standard for comparison of bone age and chronological age in normal children.
Oh Y; Lee R; Kim HS
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2012; 25(3-4):279-84. PubMed ID: 22768657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Forensic age estimation in living children: how accurate is the Greulich-Pyle method in Sabah, East Malaysia?
Nang KM; Ismail AJ; Tangaperumal A; Wynn AA; Thein TT; Hayati F; Teh YG
Front Pediatr; 2023; 11():1137960. PubMed ID: 37397141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comprehensive validation study of the latest version of BoneXpert on a large cohort of Caucasian children and adolescents.
Maratova K; Zemkova D; Sedlak P; Pavlikova M; Amaratunga SA; Krasnicanova H; Soucek O; Sumnik Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1130580. PubMed ID: 37033216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle bone age standards to Taiwanese children: A Taipei experience.
Yuh YS; Chou TY; Chow JC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2022 Jul; 85(7):767-773. PubMed ID: 35648187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Greulich and Pyle atlas: a non-reliable skeletal maturity assessment method in the North Indian population.
Tiwari PK; Nayak AK; Verma A; Pandey SK; Mishra A; Devadas D; Yadav A; Gupta M
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2024 Mar; 20(1):106-116. PubMed ID: 37071347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison between Greulich-Pyle and Girdany-Golden methods for estimating skeletal age of children in Pakistan.
Awais M; Nadeem N; Husen Y; Rehman A; Beg M; Khattak YJ
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Dec; 24(12):889-93. PubMed ID: 25523722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of bone ages: is the Greulich-Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys?
Koc A; Karaoglanoglu M; Erdogan M; Kosecik M; Cesur Y
Pediatr Int; 2001 Dec; 43(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 11737745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of Reliability of Greulich and Pyle (GP) Method for Determination of Age of Children at Debre Markos Referral Hospital, East Gojjam Zone.
Tsehay B; Afework M; Mesifin M
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2017 Nov; 27(6):631-640. PubMed ID: 29487472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The reliability of skeletal age determination in an Iranian sample using Greulich and Pyle method.
Moradi M; Sirous M; Morovatti P
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):372.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22986219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity.
Thodberg HH; Kreiborg S; Juul A; Pedersen KD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jan; 28(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 19116188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The reliability of bone age determination in central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method.
Groell R; Lindbichler F; Riepl T; Gherra L; Roposch A; Fotter R
Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):461-4. PubMed ID: 10505010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
