311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1912540)
1. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The correction for motion and visualization of subtraction angiographic data from the spiral CT].
Beier J; Richter CS; Fleck E; Felix R
Rofo; 1995 Jan; 162(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 7841403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified magnetic resonance angiography of the liver using sensitivity encoding in comparison with digital subtraction angiography and CT arterial portography.
Yan SX; Liang TB; Fujii M; Kawamitsu H; Sugimura K; Zheng SS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 May; 4(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 15908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography.
Goni H; Tsalafoutas IA; Tzortzis G; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Loulakas J; Georgiou A; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis EN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):251-5. PubMed ID: 16461514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital subtraction angiography with carbon dioxide using a new gas dosage system].
Schmitz-Rode T; Alzen G; Günther RW
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 9289046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Radiation exposure during angiography of the arteries supplying the brain. A comparison between intra-arterial DSA and the conventional technique].
Gilgenbach R; Schröder U; Heuser L
Rofo; 1990 Oct; 153(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 2171089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Studies of image quality and dose in digital subtraction angiography].
Heckmann H; Kamm KF; Vetter S; Strecker EP; Busch HP
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 9340020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rotational digital subtraction carotid angiography: technique and comparison with static digital subtraction angiography.
Bosanac Z; Miller RJ; Jain M
Clin Radiol; 1998 Sep; 53(9):682-7. PubMed ID: 9766722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Initial experiences with CO2 as a gaseous contrast medium in digital subtraction angiography].
Krasny R; Hollmann JP; Günther RW
Rofo; 1987 Apr; 146(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 3033771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lower extremity: nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography.
Therasse E; Soulez G; Roy P; Gauvin A; Oliva VL; Carrier R; Robillard P
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 9609892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Angiography of occlusive vascular disease].
Fujiwara H; Narimatsu Y; Hashimoto S; Hiramatsu K
Nihon Rinsho; 1999 Jul; 57(7):1526-30. PubMed ID: 10429452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective criteria for acceptability and constancy tests of digital subtraction angiography.
de las Heras H; Torres R; Fernández-Soto JM; Vañó E
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):272-6. PubMed ID: 26522881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Angiography in infancy and childhood].
Schild H; Thelen M; Daltrop K; Düber C; Collo J
Rofo; 1993 Jan; 158(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 8425076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease.
Ashleigh RJ; Hufton AP; Razzaq R; MacDiarmaid-Gordon L
Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):819-24. PubMed ID: 11026855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peripheral DSA with automated stepping.
Fink U; Heywang SH; Hilbertz T; Fischer K; Jenner E; Buchsteiner W
Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 1889430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
