420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19125718)
1. Read-across to rank skin sensitization potential: subcategories for the Michael acceptor domain.
Schultz TW; Rogers K; Aptula AO
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19125718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism-based read-across for non-animal based assessment of skin sensitisation potential.
Roberts DW; Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Pease C
J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 17703503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization.
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Aptula AO
Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 20(7):1019-30. PubMed ID: 17555332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements?
Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Apr; 54(4):181-5. PubMed ID: 16650091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro irritation models and immune reactions.
Gibbs S
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2009; 22(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 19188758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TIMES-SS--a mechanistic evaluation of an external validation study using reaction chemistry principles.
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G; Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Aptula AO; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MI; Phillips RD; Niemelä J; Madsen C; Wedebye EB; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Sep; 20(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 17713962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the sensitization potential of surfactants: integrating data from the local lymph node assay, guinea pig maximization test, and in vitro methods in a weight-of-evidence approach.
Ball N; Cagen S; Carrillo JC; Certa H; Eigler D; Emter R; Faulhammer F; Garcia C; Graham C; Haux C; Kolle SN; Kreiling R; Natsch A; Mehling A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Aug; 60(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 21645576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential.
Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Uriarte E
Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):521-41. PubMed ID: 18189364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach.
Enoch SJ; Madden JC; Cronin MT
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(5-6):555-78. PubMed ID: 18853302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Updating the skin sensitization in vitro data assessment paradigm in 2009.
Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2009 Aug; 29(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 19484705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT).
Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel.
Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
