1104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19125796)
41. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.
Mao CY; Yang YS; Yuan Y; Hu WP; Zhao YF; Hu Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4062-4069. PubMed ID: 31313034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Role of stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in recurrence of Crohn's disease.
Scarpa M; Angriman I; Barollo M; Polese L; Ruffolo C; Bertin M; D'Amico DF
Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(58):1053-7. PubMed ID: 15239245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Long-term outcomes after hand-sewn versus circular-stapled (25 and 29 mm) anastomotic technique after esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer.
Rostas JW; Graffree BD; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Martin RCG
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):469-472. PubMed ID: 29044576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Esophagectomy and cervical side-to-side stapled esophagogastric anastomosis.
Xin H; Han Z
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Feb; 34(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 19270355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Application of different intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis in surgery for esophageal cancer].
Han Y; Zhang Y; Li H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 21(9):995-1000. PubMed ID: 30269318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.
Pines G; Buyeviz V; Machlenkin S; Klein Y; Laor A; Kashtan H
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19431220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An evaluation of the routine use of contrast radiography as a screening test for cervical anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy.
Solomon DG; Sasaki CT; Salem RR
Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 21906717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses.
Haverkamp L; van der Sluis PC; Verhage RJ; Siersema PD; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 May; 17(5):872-6. PubMed ID: 23400509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis.
Worrell S; Mumtaz S; Tsuboi K; Lee TH; Mittal SK
J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19922950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Quality of life in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy and circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis via retrosternal route].
Wang YB; Cai RJ; Han YJ; Wang WJ; Yang XY; Liu SE
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 14(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 21713702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
