148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1912646)
1. Article review process.
Burr G
Confed Aust Crit Care Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 4(3):17. PubMed ID: 1912646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How does peer review work?
Aaron L
Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diversity, debate, and discourse.
Haller KB
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(4):283. PubMed ID: 1941289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Eur Psychiatry; 2009 Mar; 24(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 19248983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Harefuah peer review].
Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
Glimelius B
Acta Oncol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 29303398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
Nahata MC
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publishing in learned journals.
Arseculeratne SN
Indian J Med Res; 2010 Nov; 132(5):525-6. PubMed ID: 21150003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
Probst TM; Hagger MS
Stress Health; 2015 Aug; 31(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 26250351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.
Jull G; Moore A
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Art of Peer Review.
Fraser D
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does editorial peer review work?
Lock S
Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
Frey JJ
Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. JMG Online: exploiting the potential of electronic publication and manuscript submission.
Maher ER
J Med Genet; 2001 Dec; 38(12):809. PubMed ID: 11748302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
Brandon D; McGrath JM
Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Making the most of peer review.
Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
