These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19126490)

  • 1. Quantitative modeling of reflected ultrasonic bounded beams and a new estimate of the Schoch shift.
    Bouzidi Y; Schmitt DR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Dec; 55(12):2661-73. PubMed ID: 19126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An algorithm for quantitatively modeling reflected ultrasonic bounded pulses and beams.
    Malehmir R; Kazemi N; Schmitt DR
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Sep; 80():15-21. PubMed ID: 28494229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast beating null strip during the reflection of pulsed Gaussian beams incident at the Rayleigh angle.
    Declercq NF
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1447-51. PubMed ID: 16815510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental study of ultrasonic beam sectors for energy conversion into Lamb waves and Rayleigh waves.
    Declercq NF
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):609-13. PubMed ID: 24079915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fringed sound fields and their interaction with liquid-solid interfaces.
    Declercq NF; Degrieck J; Leroy O
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1117-22. PubMed ID: 16793078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the reflection of coupled Rayleigh-like waves at surface defects in plates.
    Masserey B; Fromme P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 18177141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bounded beam interaction with thin inclusions. Characterization by phase differences at Rayleigh angle incidence.
    Briers R; Leroy O; Shkerdin G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1622-30. PubMed ID: 11051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic field modeling for immersed components using Gaussian beam superposition.
    Spies M
    Ultrasonics; 2007 May; 46(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 17335863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow patterns and transport in Rayleigh surface acoustic wave streaming: combined finite element method and raytracing numerics versus experiments.
    Frommelt T; Gogel D; Kostur M; Talkner P; Hänggi P; Wixforth A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2298-305. PubMed ID: 18986877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theory and analysis of frequency-domain photoacoustic tomography.
    Baddour N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2577-90. PubMed ID: 18529177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffuse ultrasonic backscatter at normal incidence through a curved interface.
    Ghoshal G; Turner JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3449-58. PubMed ID: 21218878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental study of focused ultrasonic beams reflected at a fluid-solid interface in the neighborhood of the Rayleigh angle.
    Matikas TE; Rousseau M; Gatignol P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1992; 39(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 18267690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasonic measurements on poroelastic slabs: determination of reflection and transmission coefficients and processing for Biot input parameters.
    Jocker J; Smeulders D
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):319-30. PubMed ID: 19081590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical angle-dependent Biot and MBA models for acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone.
    Lee KI; Hughes ER; Humphrey VF; Leighton TG; Choi MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 17183128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A feasibility study of the use of bounded beams resembling the shape of evanescent and inhomogeneous waves.
    Declercq NF; Leroy O
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):752-7. PubMed ID: 21453948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear ultrasonic propagation in bubbly liquids: a numerical model.
    Vanhille C; Campos-Pozuelo C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 May; 34(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 18314254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Jones matrix formalism for the theory of picosecond shear acoustic pulse detection.
    Mounier D; Picart P; Babilotte P; Ruello P; Breteau JM; Pézeril T; Vaudel G; Kouyaté M; Gusev V
    Opt Express; 2010 Mar; 18(7):6767-78. PubMed ID: 20389697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fresnel approximations for acoustic fields of rectangularly symmetric sources.
    Mast TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3311-22. PubMed ID: 17552683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of modeling approaches to ultrasonic testing at near critical angles.
    Song SJ; Park JS; Kim YH; Kim HJ; Kim JH; Eom HS
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):283-9. PubMed ID: 15047299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Entrainment and stimulated emission of ultrasonic piezoelectric auto-oscillators.
    Weaver RL; Lobkis OI; Yamilov A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3409-18. PubMed ID: 18247750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.