These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19126583)

  • 1. Methodological issues in analyzing time trends in biologic fertility: protection bias.
    Key J; Best N; Joffe M; Jensen TK; Keiding N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 169(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19126583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time trends in human fecundability in Sweden.
    Scheike TH; Rylander L; Carstensen L; Keiding N; Jensen TK; Stromberg U; Joffe M; Akre O
    Epidemiology; 2008 Mar; 19(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 18223482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Has human fertility declined over time?: why we may never know.
    Sallmén M; Weinberg CR; Baird DD; Lindbohm ML; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 15951667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time trends in biological fertility in Western Europe.
    Joffe M; Holmes J; Jensen TK; Keiding N; Best N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 178(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 23887045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cohort comparison of two fertility awareness methods of family planning.
    Fehring RJ; Schneider M; Barron ML; Raviele K
    J Reprod Med; 2009 Mar; 54(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 19370902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity issues relating to time-to-pregnancy studies of fertility.
    Bonde JP; Joffe M; Sallmén M; Kristensen P; Olsen J; Roeleveld N; Wilcox A
    Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 16810093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recruitment bias in studies of semen and other factors affecting pregnancy rates in fertile men.
    Stewart TM; Liu DY; Garrett C; Brown EH; Baker HW
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2401-8. PubMed ID: 19553241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity.
    Hassan MA; Killick SR
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):384-92. PubMed ID: 14967378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-to-pregnancy among male greenhouse workers.
    Bretveld R; Kik S; Hooiveld M; van Rooij I; Zielhuis G; Roeleveld N
    Occup Environ Med; 2008 Mar; 65(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 17855503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical methods for estimating the probability of spontaneous abortion in observational studies--analyzing pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives.
    Meister R; Schaefer C
    Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Sep; 26(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18620043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is human fecundity declining in Western countries?
    te Velde E; Burdorf A; Nieschlag E; Eijkemans R; Kremer JA; Roeleveld N; Habbema D
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jun; 25(6):1348-53. PubMed ID: 20395222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology.
    Leridon H; Slama R
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jun; 23(6):1312-9. PubMed ID: 18387960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of a fertility awareness based method to avoid pregnancy in relation to a couple's sexual behaviour during the fertile time: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Frank-Herrmann P; Heil J; Gnoth C; Toledo E; Baur S; Pyper C; Jenetzky E; Strowitzki T; Freundl G
    Hum Reprod; 2007 May; 22(5):1310-9. PubMed ID: 17314078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fertility control? Middle-aged Australian women's retrospective reports of their pregnancies.
    Weisberg E; Bateson D; Read C; Estoesta J; Lee C
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 32(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 18782406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are volunteers delivering semen samples in fertility studies a biased population?
    Eustache F; Auger J; Cabrol D; Jouannet P
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2831-7. PubMed ID: 15459173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Workshop recommendations for the preconception cohort of the National Children's Study.
    Selevan SG; Stanford JB
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 20 Suppl 1():60-5. PubMed ID: 17061975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraception and pregnancy then and now: examining the experiences of a cohort of mid-age Australian women.
    Read C; Bateson D; Weisberg E; Estoesta J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug; 49(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 19694702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design options and sources of bias in time-to-pregnancy studies.
    Olsen J
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1999; 25 Suppl 1():5-7; discussion 76-8. PubMed ID: 10235396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the impact of past pregnancy outcome on future fertility.
    Orji EO
    Singapore Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1021-4. PubMed ID: 19122955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.