These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19126834)

  • 21. Battered woman syndrome defense in Canadian courts.
    Regehr C; Glancy G
    Can J Psychiatry; 1995 Apr; 40(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 7606702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Battered women who kill their abusers: an examination of commonsense notions, cognitions, and judgments.
    Huss MT; Tomkins AJ; Garbin CP; Schopp RF; Kilian A
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1063-80. PubMed ID: 16829667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Australia's Divergent Legal Responses to Women Who Kill Their Abusive Partners.
    Nash C; Dioso-Villa R
    Violence Against Women; 2024 Jul; 30(9):2275-2301. PubMed ID: 36794459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
    Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Justifiability, sympathy level, and internal/external locus of the reasons battered women remain in abusive relationships.
    Follingstad DR; Runge MM; Ace A; Buzan R; Helff C
    Violence Vict; 2001 Dec; 16(6):621-44. PubMed ID: 11863062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
    Cirincione C
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8807157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Battered woman syndrome testimony in Canada: its development and lingering issues.
    Tang KL
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Dec; 47(6):618-29. PubMed ID: 14661383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response to Simon: Legal relevance demands that evil be defined and standardized.
    Welner M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 14974795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.
    Jenkins G; Schuller RA
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 17211690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Was it murder or insanity? Reactions to a successful paroxysmal insanity plea in 1865.
    Spiegel AD; Spiegel AM
    Women Health; 1992; 18(2):69-86. PubMed ID: 1632102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of expert testimony on the believability of repressed memories.
    Sugarman DB; Boney-McCoy S
    Violence Vict; 1997; 12(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 9403982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.