These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19126834)

  • 41. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
    Moffa MS; Platania J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Commentary: "Countertransference" on trial--witness or defendant?
    Sledge WH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 15281416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
    Woody WD; Forrest KD
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Bradshaw GS; Dunlap EE; Hodell EC
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 17446571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Commentary: personality disorders and criminal law.
    Slovenko R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(2):182-5. PubMed ID: 19535554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy and expert testimony.
    Hoge SK; Grisso T
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 1576376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
    Devenport JL; Cutler BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Women who kill: the impact of abuse.
    Grant CA
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 1995; 16(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 7615379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Homicide markers from the viewpoint of the psychiatric expert].
    Janzarik W
    Nervenarzt; 1992 Nov; 63(11):656-67. PubMed ID: 1470268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The bottom line: the effect of written expert witness statements on juror verdicts and information processing.
    ForsterLee L; Horowitz I; Athaide-Victor E; Brown N
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 10810841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Memories and murder.
    Appelbaum PS
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):679-80. PubMed ID: 1516898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Legal prognosis of homicide crimes].
    Strehlow U
    Acta Paedopsychiatr; 1991; 54(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 1810127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Keeping criticism at bay: suggestions for forensic psychiatry experts.
    Friend A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 14974793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Intuitive evaluation of guilt of violent offenders in relation to offender personality].
    Endres J
    Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):353-85. PubMed ID: 8640478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rock v. Arkansas: hypnosis, the defendant's privilege.
    Orne MT; Dinges DF; Orne EC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):250-65. PubMed ID: 2258243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An unwelcome guest: the unconscious mind in the courtroom.
    Kapoor R; Williams A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 23233464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.