These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19126900)

  • 1. Prosthesis design and stress profile after hip resurfacing: a finite element analysis.
    Heijink A; Zobitz ME; Nuyts R; Morrey BF; An KN
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2008 Dec; 16(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 19126900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical and finite element analysis of femoral neck notching during hip resurfacing.
    Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Papini M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041002. PubMed ID: 19275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head.
    Taylor M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 16669395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
    Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation.
    Tai CL; Chen YC; Hsieh PH
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Aug; 15():262. PubMed ID: 25095740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design of new generation femoral prostheses using functionally graded materials: a finite element analysis.
    Oshkour AA; Abu Osman NA; Yau YH; Tarlochan F; Abas WA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jan; 227(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 23516951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of femur size and morphology on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: A large scale, multi-subject finite element study.
    Bryan R; Nair PB; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2012 Jul; 45(11):1952-8. PubMed ID: 22704609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component.
    Watanabe Y; Shiba N; Matsuo S; Higuchi F; Tagawa Y; Inoue A
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 10884212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.
    Olsen M; Al Saied M; Morison Z; Sellan M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 25515228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical effects of bone-implant fitness and screw breakage on the stability and stress performance of the nonstemmed hip system.
    Chen CM; Cheng CT; Lin CS; Lin SC; Chiang CC; Luo CA; Tseng CS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Feb; 29(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 24418222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
    Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.