139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19127143)
21. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [A static mechanical comparison between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine].
Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Yin JW; Jiang WY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 87(23):1599-602. PubMed ID: 17803847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.
Majid K; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical study of anterior cervical corpectomy and step-cut grafting with bioabsorbable screws fixation in cadaveric cervical spine model.
Zhang J; He X; Li H; Wang D; Zhao W; Xu J; Lan B; Xu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2195-201. PubMed ID: 16946653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.
Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Hokari Y; Neale PG; Zhao C; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):E363-70. PubMed ID: 17545899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Augmentation of occipitocervical contoured rod fixation with C1-C2 transarticular screws.
Yüksel KZ; Crawford NR; Melton MS; Dickman CA
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 17321967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Biomechanical effect of the iliac screw insertion depth on lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
Chen H; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Lü Y; Zhang KB; Liu H; Li FB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 46(15):1179-82. PubMed ID: 19094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws.
Cyr SJ; Currier BL; Eck JC; Foy A; Chen Q; Larson DR; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):661-5. PubMed ID: 17526435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques.
White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18391719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanics of occipitocervical fixation.
Anderson PA; Oza AL; Puschak TJ; Sasso R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):755-61. PubMed ID: 16582848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2].
Hu Y; He XF; Ma WH; Xu RM; Ruan YP; Feng JX; Yang SH
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Jan; 22(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19203027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation.
Eck JC; Walker MP; Currier BL; Chen Q; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 17912127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.
Cordista A; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Walters S; Rechtine G
Spine J; 2006; 6(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 16825053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
