156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19127469)
21. Assessing agreement with repeated measures for random observers.
Chen CC; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3546-59. PubMed ID: 22095759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Closed-form confidence intervals on measures of precision for an interlaboratory study.
Nijhuis MB; van den Heuvel ER
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 17219759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers.
Haber M; Barnhart HX
Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the concordance correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient with small number of raters.
Feng D; Svetnik V; Coimbra A; Baumgartner R
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(2):272-93. PubMed ID: 24605969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer programs for the concordance correlation coefficient.
Crawford SB; Kosinski AS; Lin HM; Williamson JM; Barnhart HX
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 17709153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Noninferiority tests based on concordance correlation coefficient for assessment of the agreement for gene expression data from microarray experiments.
Liao CT; Lin CY; Liu JP
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 17365226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2838-56. PubMed ID: 20860066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.
Quimby ML; Vig KW; Rashid RG; Firestone AR
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 15264638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Estimation of the shelf-life of drugs with mixed effects models.
Chen JJ; Hwang JS; Tsong Y
J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 7613558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing the concentration curves directly in a pharmacokinetics, bioavailability/bioequivalence study.
Liao JJ
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 15558699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A point estimator for the time course of drug release.
Koehne-Voss S; Pigeot I
Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):146-58. PubMed ID: 19219906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Copula based prediction models: an application to an aortic regurgitation study.
Kumar P; Shoukri MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17573974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Matrix-based concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures.
Hiriote S; Chinchilli VM
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21306355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
