190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19128956)
1. The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer.
den Dulk M; Putter H; Collette L; Marijnen CAM; Folkesson J; Bosset JF; Rödel C; Bujko K; Påhlman L; van de Velde CJH
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 19128956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin.
Wang L; Gu GL; Li ZW; Peng YF; Gu J
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(27):9138-45. PubMed ID: 25083087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Raftopoulos I; Reed JF; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 21689315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center.
Nissan A; Guillem JG; Paty PB; Douglas Wong W; Minsky B; Saltz L; Cohen AM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jan; 44(1):27-35; discussion 35-6. PubMed ID: 11805560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection: comparison of long-term oncologic outcome in matched patients with lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Kim JH; Kim TW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Apr; 28(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 23053680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.
Marr R; Birbeck K; Garvican J; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons WJ; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Sebag-Montefiore D; Scott N; Johnston D; Sagar P; Finan P; Quirke P
Ann Surg; 2005 Jul; 242(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 15973104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A population-based comparison of overall and disease-specific survival following local excision or abdominoperineal resection for stage I rectal adenocarcinoma.
Olsheski M; Schwartz D; Rineer J; Wortham A; Sura S; Sugiyama G; Rotman M; Schreiber D
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2013 Sep; 44(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23564262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection in lower and middle rectal cancer.
Omidvari S; Hamedi SH; Mohammadianpanah M; Razzaghi S; Mosalaei A; Ahmadloo N; Ansari M; Pourahmad S
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2013 Sep; 25(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 23932752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.
Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Yang Y; Zhao BC
Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 22920402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.
Porter GA; Soskolne CL; Yakimets WW; Newman SC
Ann Surg; 1998 Feb; 227(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 9488510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
Bülow S; Christensen IJ; Iversen LH; Harling H;
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Nov; 13(11):1256-64. PubMed ID: 20958912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Extraperitoneal Rectal Cancer.
Shin DW; Shin JY; Oh SJ; Park JK; Yu H; Ahn MS; Bae KB; Hong KH; Ji YI
Am Surg; 2016 Apr; 82(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 27097629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
