These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19129125)

  • 81. [Intra-amniotic transmission of the human voice].
    Querleu D; Renard X; Versyp F; Paris-Delrue L; Vervoort P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jan; 83(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 3347813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Physiological and perceptual correlates of masculinity in children's voices.
    Cartei V; Banerjee R; Garnham A; Oakhill J; Roberts L; Anns S; Bond R; Reby D
    Horm Behav; 2020 Jan; 117():104616. PubMed ID: 31644889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Sex matters: Neural correlates of voice gender perception.
    Junger J; Pauly K; Bröhr S; Birkholz P; Neuschaefer-Rube C; Kohler C; Schneider F; Derntl B; Habel U
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():275-87. PubMed ID: 23660030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication study.
    Shiramizu V; Docherty C; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242262. PubMed ID: 33186368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Exogenous testosterone decreases men's sensitivity to vocal cues of male dominance.
    Han C; Watkins CD; Nan Y; Ou J; Lei X; Li X; Wu Y
    Horm Behav; 2021 Jan; 127():104871. PubMed ID: 33058835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
    Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.
    Kopf LM; Skowronski MD; Anand S; Eddins DA; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):204-213. PubMed ID: 29162356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Selection of a voice for a speech signal for personalized warnings: the effect of speaker's gender and voice pitch.
    Machado S; Duarte E; Teles J; Reis L; Rebelo F
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3592-8. PubMed ID: 22317268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity.
    Lee AJ; Zietsch BP
    Biol Lett; 2011 Dec; 7(6):892-5. PubMed ID: 21697166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Gender-role ideology and height preference in mate selection.
    Tao HL
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Dec; 39():100927. PubMed ID: 33126024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Voice pitch: a window into the communication of social power.
    Aung T; Puts D
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2020 Jun; 33():154-161. PubMed ID: 31445439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Horses cross-modally recognize women and men.
    Gouyet C; Ringhofer M; Yamamoto S; Jardat P; Parias C; Reigner F; Calandreau L; Lansade L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3864. PubMed ID: 36890162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Provisioning offspring and others: risk-energy trade-offs and gender differences in hunter-gatherer foraging strategies.
    Codding BF; Bird RB; Bird DW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Aug; 278(1717):2502-9. PubMed ID: 21227967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice.
    Lenton AP; Francesconi M
    Biol Lett; 2011 Aug; 7(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 21367779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.