BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19130065)

  • 1. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins].
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):17-22. PubMed ID: 15752661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Degree of cervical shortening after initial induction of labor as a predictor of subsequent successful induction.
    Kang WS; Park KH; Kim SN; Shin DM; Hong JS; Jung HJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 20205152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
    Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.
    Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body mass index, Bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations.
    Park KH; Hong JS; Kang WS; Shin DM; Kim SN
    J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 19492921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.