290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19130065)
21. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length.
Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical and sonographic parameters at 37 weeks' gestation for predicting the risk of primary Cesarean delivery in nulliparous women.
Kim SN; Park KH; Jung HJ; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 20586108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction.
Ware V; Raynor BD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score.
Gonen R; Degani S; Ron A
Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction.
Yanik A; Gülümser C; Tosun M
Adv Ther; 2007; 24(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 17901024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women.
Daskalakis G; Thomakos N; Hatziioannou L; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N; Antsaklis A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16354972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Transvaginal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix before induction of labor].
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quéreux C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Dec; 29(12):919-23. PubMed ID: 11802557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
Vayssière C; Favre R; Audibert F; Chauvet MP; Gaucherand P; Tardif D; Grangé G; Novoa A; Descamps P; Perdu M; Andrini E; Janse-Marec J; Maillard F; Nisand I;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 16273595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome.
Kehila M; Abouda HS; Sahbi K; Cheour H; Chanoufi MB
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016 May; 9(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 27197935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ultrasonographic and clinical methods in the management of prolonged pregnancy].
Rosati P; Ciliberti P; Buongiorno S; Alessio A; Mappa I; Guariglia L; Capelli G; Scambia G
Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Apr; 66(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 24848077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor.
Yang SH; Roh CR; Kim JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Mar; 23(3):375-82, quiz 384-5. PubMed ID: 15055785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables.
Prado CA; Araujo Júnior E; Duarte G; Quintana SM; Tonni G; Cavalli Rde C; Marcolin AC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26742573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?
Eggebø TM; Økland I; Heien C; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 19172418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable.
Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 23(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 15170797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Comparison study on transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement and cytokine in prediction of the cervical ripening and the onset time of term labor].
Jian L; Mu X; Wu W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(12):708-11. PubMed ID: 12622909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis.
Crane JM
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 49(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 16885664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
