These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1913049)

  • 1. Measuring the filtration of mammographic X-ray tubes with molybdenum targets.
    Cranley K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):842-5. PubMed ID: 1913049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental "trans-molybdenum" tube for mammography.
    Johnson GA; O'Foghludha F
    Radiology; 1978 May; 127(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 644079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum as target material for mammographic x-ray tubes.
    Rini JM; Horowitz A; Balter S; Watson RC
    Radiology; 1973 Mar; 106(3):657-61. PubMed ID: 4684810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molybdenum/aluminum filters perform effectively.
    Burns CB; Renner JB
    Radiol Technol; 1993; 64(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 8464998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a defective filter on magnification image quality in mammography.
    Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):894-5. PubMed ID: 1535914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of x-ray spectra and outputs from molybdenum and tungsten targets.
    Marshall M; Peaple LH; Ardran GM; Crooks HE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Jan; 48(565):31-9. PubMed ID: 1109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Considerations regarding optimal mammography techniques].
    Hach G
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972 Sep; 117(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 4342580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dosimetric and qualitative evaluations of the use of rhodium filtration in mammography].
    Burke P; Luparia E; Frigerio A; Marra V; Milani R; Di Benedetto A; Simeone F
    Radiol Med; 1994 Sep; 88(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 7938738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of ion chambers for use in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Jan; 66(781):51-4. PubMed ID: 8428251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A calibration comparison of mammographic kVp meters.
    Simeoni RJ; Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Mar; 15(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1575649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generators, x-ray tubes, and exposure geometry in mammography.
    Villafana T
    Radiographics; 1990 May; 10(3):539-54. PubMed ID: 2343172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed dose in mammography using three tungsten and three molybdenum target tubes.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Tanner BK; Barnette PA
    Radiology; 1971 Dec; 101(3):697-9. PubMed ID: 5129114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.