BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19130502)

  • 1. Blind docking of 260 protein-ligand complexes with EADock 2.0.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Oct; 30(13):2021-30. PubMed ID: 19130502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the FACTS solvation model for protein-ligand docking calculations. Application to EADock.
    Zoete V; Grosdidier A; Cuendet M; Michielin O
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 20101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
    Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
    Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective handling of induced-fit motion in flexible docking.
    Mizutani MY; Takamatsu Y; Ichinose T; Nakamura K; Itai A
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):878-91. PubMed ID: 16532451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High quality binding modes in docking ligands to proteins.
    Gorelik B; Goldblum A
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18058908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ph4Dock: pharmacophore-based protein-ligand docking.
    Goto J; Kataoka R; Hirayama N
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6804-11. PubMed ID: 15615529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility.
    Antes I
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1084-104. PubMed ID: 20017216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2149-59. PubMed ID: 21541955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation studies of the site-directed docking program LibDock.
    Rao SN; Head MS; Kulkarni A; LaLonde JM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2159-71. PubMed ID: 17985863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blind docking method combining search of low-resolution binding sites with ligand pose refinement by molecular dynamics-based global optimization.
    Vorobjev YN
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(5):1080-92. PubMed ID: 19821514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting multiple ligand binding modes using self-consistent pharmacophore hypotheses.
    Wallach I; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2116-28. PubMed ID: 19711952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ligand-protein docking using a quantum stochastic tunneling optimization method.
    Mancera RL; Källblad P; Todorov NP
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 15011257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.