These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19130648)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of a pressure algometer.
    Kinser AM; Sands WA; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):312-4. PubMed ID: 19130648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of a new fingertip-shaped pressure algometer for assessing pressure pain thresholds in the temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles.
    Bernhardt O; Schiffman EL; Look JO
    J Orofac Pain; 2007; 21(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17312639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of cross-friction algometry procedure in referred muscle pain syndromes: preliminary results of a new referred pain provocation technique with the aid of a Fischer pressure algometer in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
    Farasyn AD; Meeusen R; Nijs J
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jun; 24(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 18496311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novice assessors demonstrate good intra-rater agreement and reliability when determining pressure pain thresholds; a cross-sectional study.
    Reezigt RR; Slager GEC; Coppieters MW; Scholten-Peeters GGM
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14565. PubMed ID: 36624753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Measuring pressure pain thresholds. Comparison of an electromechanically controlled algometer with established methods].
    Dagtekin O; König E; Gerbershagen HJ; Marcus H; Sabatowski R; Petzke F
    Schmerz; 2007 Oct; 21(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 17497183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Algometer for Vestibular Pain Assessment in Women with Provoked Vestibulodynia.
    Cyr MP; Bourbonnais D; Pinard A; Dubois O; Morin M
    Pain Med; 2016 Jul; 17(7):1220-8. PubMed ID: 26814295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars.
    Kelly-Martin R; Doughty L; Garkavi M; Wasserman JB
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Algometry with a clothes peg compared to an electronic pressure algometer: a randomized cross-sectional study in pain patients.
    Egloff N; Klingler N; von Känel R; Cámara RJ; Curatolo M; Wegmann B; Marti E; Ferrari ML
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Jul; 12():174. PubMed ID: 21787399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters.
    Chesterton LS; Sim J; Wright CC; Foster NE
    Clin J Pain; 2007; 23(9):760-6. PubMed ID: 18075402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demonstration and validation of a new pressure-based MRI-safe pain tolerance device.
    Davis MT; Daniel TA; Witte TK; Beyers RJ; Willis JZ; Wang Y; Denney TS; Katz JS; Salibi N; Deshpande G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Sep; 271():160-8. PubMed ID: 27378028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving coil pressure algometer produces consistent force gradient and repeated stimulation.
    Adnadjevic D; Graven-Nielsen T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6591-4. PubMed ID: 23367440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure-pain threshold algometric measurement in patients with greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty.
    Sayed-Noor AS; Englund E; Wretenberg P; Sjödén GO
    Clin J Pain; 2008; 24(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 18287829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlled manual loading of body tissues: towards the next generation of pressure algometer.
    Evans DW; De Nunzio AM
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Oct; 28(1):51. PubMed ID: 33012288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing mechanical allodynia in the rat paw with a new electronic algometer.
    Möller KA; Johansson B; Berge OG
    J Neurosci Methods; 1998 Oct; 84(1-2):41-7. PubMed ID: 9821632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaginal algometer: development and application of a device to monitor vaginal wall pressure pain threshold.
    Baguley SD; Curnow JS; Morrison GD; Barron LF
    Physiol Meas; 2003 Nov; 24(4):833-6. PubMed ID: 14658776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal pressure-pain thresholds: initial validation and reliability assessment in healthy women.
    Tu FF; Fitzgerald CM; Kuiken T; Farrell T; Norman Harden R
    Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 18180636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High concurrent validity between digital and analogue algometers to measure pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and people with migraine: a cross-sectional study.
    Castien RF; Coppieters MW; Durge TSC; Scholten-Peeters GGM
    J Headache Pain; 2021 Jul; 22(1):69. PubMed ID: 34253164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumental validity and intra/inter-rater reliability of a novel low-cost digital pressure algometer.
    Jerez-Mayorga D; Dos Anjos CF; Macedo MC; Fernandes IG; Aedo-Muñoz E; Intelangelo L; Barbosa AC
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10162. PubMed ID: 33083153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients-The reliability of a pressure algometer.
    Knapstad MK; Nordahl SHG; Naterstad IF; Ask T; Skouen JS; Goplen FK
    Physiother Res Int; 2018 Oct; 23(4):e1736. PubMed ID: 30088327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An inexpensive, self-assembly pressure algometer.
    Johnson TW; Watson PJ
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Nov; 52(11):1070-2. PubMed ID: 9404169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.