These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19131014)
1. Spuriously precise results from meta-analysis. Is better statistical correction or a more critical methodological assessment warranted? van Amelsvoort LG; Viechtbauer W; Spigt MG J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):123-5; discussion 126-7. PubMed ID: 19131014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Meta-Jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Sandelowski M Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 16487774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. Ioannidis JP J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold? Papageorgiou SN J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis. Petrucci N Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 167(6):935; author reply 935-6. PubMed ID: 12653110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication. Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists. Lopez-Lee D Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to make sense of clinical research. Wooten JM; Ross VM RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity in research. Roberts P; Priest H Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: "Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods". Vandenbroucke JP Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(9):1007-9. PubMed ID: 7572968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Practice of systematic reviews. VII. Pooling of results from observational studies]. Zeegers MP; Heisterkamp SH; Kostense PJ; van der Windt DA; Scholten RJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jul; 144(29):1393-7. PubMed ID: 10923147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synthesizing the evidence: how far can your confidence meter take you? Fineout-Overholt E AACN Adv Crit Care; 2008; 19(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 18670209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Re-interpreting conventional interval estimates taking into account bias and extra-variation. Höfler M; Seaman SR BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Oct; 6():51. PubMed ID: 17042949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]