170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19131669)
1. Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study.
Richards MS; Barbone PE; Oberai AA
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):757-79. PubMed ID: 19131669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Elasticity reconstruction from displacement and confidence measures of a multi-compressed ultrasound RF sequence.
Li J; Cui Y; Kadour M; Noble JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18334339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue.
Khaled W; Reichling S; Bruhns OT; Ermert H
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e199-202. PubMed ID: 16857230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D estimation of soft biological tissue deformation from radio-frequency ultrasound volume acquisitions.
Deprez JF; Brusseau E; Schmitt C; Cloutier G; Basset O
Med Image Anal; 2009 Feb; 13(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 18823814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology.
Bamber J; Cosgrove D; Dietrich CF; Fromageau J; Bojunga J; Calliada F; Cantisani V; Correas JM; D'Onofrio M; Drakonaki EE; Fink M; Friedrich-Rust M; Gilja OH; Havre RF; Jenssen C; Klauser AS; Ohlinger R; Saftoiu A; Schaefer F; Sporea I; Piscaglia F
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 23558397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.
Xia R; Tao G; Thittai AK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 24859661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonlinear elasticity imaging: theory and phantom study.
Erkamp RQ; Emelianov SY; Skovoroda AR; O'Donnell M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 15217231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational elastography from standard ultrasound image sequences by global trust region optimization.
Kybic J; Smutek D
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():299-310. PubMed ID: 17354704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for characterization of tissue elastic properties combining ultrasonic computed tomography with elastography.
Glozman T; Azhari H
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Mar; 29(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 20194935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incompressible deformation estimation algorithm (IDEA) from tagged MR images.
Liu X; Abd-Elmoniem KZ; Stone M; Murano EZ; Zhuo J; Gullapalli RP; Prince JL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):326-40. PubMed ID: 21937342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.
Balleyguier C; Canale S; Ben Hassen W; Vielh P; Bayou EH; Mathieu MC; Uzan C; Bourgier C; Dromain C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 22445593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound elastography: advantages, limitations and artefacts of the different techniques from a study on a phantom.
Franchi-Abella S; Elie C; Correas JM
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 May; 94(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 23567179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound elastography based on multiscale estimations of regularized displacement fields.
Pellot-Barakat C; Frouin F; Insana MF; Herment A
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 14964561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.
Wang Y; Bayer M; Jiang J; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3145-3159. PubMed ID: 31548103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of continuously tagged MRI for the measurement of dynamic 3D skeletal muscle tissue deformation.
Moerman KM; Sprengers AM; Simms CK; Lamerichs RM; Stoker J; Nederveen AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1793-810. PubMed ID: 22482602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
