These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19132632)

  • 21. Attentional switching in the sequential flanker task: age, location, and time course effects.
    Li KZ; Dupuis K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):416-27. PubMed ID: 17869202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching.
    Gruber O; Karch S; Schlueter EK; Falkai P; Goschke T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):887-95. PubMed ID: 16490365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task switching across the life span: effects of age on general and specific switch costs.
    Reimers S; Maylor EA
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 16060812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression.
    Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Caffeine improves anticipatory processes in task switching.
    Tieges Z; Snel J; Kok A; Wijnen JG; Lorist MM; Richard Ridderinkhof K
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16549227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task switching capacities in persons with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.
    Belleville S; Bherer L; Lepage E; Chertkow H; Gauthier S
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2225-33. PubMed ID: 18374374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation.
    Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 18717737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Action video game experience reduces the cost of switching tasks.
    Cain MS; Landau AN; Shimamura AP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 May; 74(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 22415446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New paradigm for task switching strategies while performing multiple tasks: entropy and symbolic dynamics analysis of voluntary patterns.
    Guastello SJ; Gorin H; Huschen S; Peters NE; Fabisch M; Poston K
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2012 Oct; 16(4):471-97. PubMed ID: 22980455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of 40 h constant wakefulness on task-switching efficiency.
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Steinborn MB; Ulrich R
    J Sleep Res; 2009 Jun; 18(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19645962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: an event-related potential study.
    Hsieh S; Cheng P
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 16647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.
    Hunt AR; Ishigami Y; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):923-7. PubMed ID: 17328396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.