116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19132752)
1. Minimizing misclassification of hormone users at mammography screening.
Njor SH; Pedersen AT; Schwartz W; Hallas J; Lynge E
Int J Cancer; 2009 May; 124(9):2159-65. PubMed ID: 19132752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Type of hormone therapy and risk of misclassification at mammography screening.
Njor SH; Hallas J; Schwartz W; Lynge E; Pedersen AT
Menopause; 2011 Feb; 18(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 20729766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.
Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens.
Hofvind S; Møller B; Thoresen S; Ursin G
Int J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 118(12):3112-7. PubMed ID: 16395702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.
Christiansen CL; Wang F; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Elmore JG; Gelfand AE; Fletcher SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11036111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms.
Thurfjell MG; Vitak B; Azavedo E; Svane G; Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol; 2000 Jan; 41(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography.
Pinckney RG; Geller BM; Burman M; Littenberg B
Am J Med; 2003 Feb; 114(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 12586231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening.
Roelofs AA; Karssemeijer N; Wedekind N; Beck C; van Woudenberg S; Snoeren PR; Hendriks JH; Rosselli del Turco M; Bjurstam N; Junkermann H; Beijerinck D; Séradour B; Evertsz CJ
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 17185661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do breast cancer risk factors modify the association between hormone therapy and mammographic breast density? (United States).
Aiello EJ; Buist DS; White E
Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Dec; 17(10):1227-35. PubMed ID: 17111253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hormone replacement therapy and false positive recall in the Million Women Study: patterns of use, hormonal constituents and consistency of effect.
Banks E; Reeves G; Beral V; Bull D; Crossley B; Simmonds M; Hilton E; Bailey S; Barrett N; Briers P; English R; Jackson A; Kutt E; Lavelle J; Rockall L; Wallis MG; Wilson M; Patnick J
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(1):R8. PubMed ID: 16417651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
