BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19133022)

  • 21. Long-term results for Kinemax and Kinematic knee bearings on a six-station knee wear simulator.
    Ash HE; Burgess IC; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(5):437-47. PubMed ID: 11109851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The wear and kinematics of two medially stabilised total knee replacement systems.
    Cowie RM; Cullum CJ; Collins SN; Jennings LM
    Knee; 2024 Mar; 47():160-170. PubMed ID: 38394995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Polyethylene wear particle generation in vivo in an alumina medial pivot total knee prosthesis.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Miyaguchi M; Kadoya Y; Ohashi H; Takaoka K
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):6034-40. PubMed ID: 15893371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pop-top tibial component: elimination of back-side wear with potential modularity.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Mallory TH
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():253-60. PubMed ID: 15744698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meniscal wear at a three-component total ankle prosthesis by a knee joint simulator.
    Affatato S; Leardini A; Leardini W; Giannini S; Viceconti M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1871-6. PubMed ID: 17014854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16185700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigation of wear of knee prostheses in a new displacement/force-controlled simulator.
    Barnett PI; McEwen HM; Auger DD; Stone MH; Ingham E; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 11908483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty.
    Wasielewski RC; Galante JO; Leighty RM; Natarajan RN; Rosenberg AG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):31-43. PubMed ID: 8119035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics.
    Fregly BJ; Sawyer WG; Harman MK; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 15598458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees.
    Sathasivam S; Walker PS
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Sep; 16(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 9820279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro wear assessment of the Charité Artificial Disc according to ASTM recommendations.
    Serhan HA; Dooris AP; Parsons ML; Ares PJ; Gabriel SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1900-10. PubMed ID: 16924206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of A-P translation and rotation on the wear of UHMWPE in a total knee joint simulator.
    Kawanabe K; Clarke IC; Tamura J; Akagi M; Good VD; Williams PA; Yamamoto K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Mar; 54(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 11189047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of a six station knee wear simulator and preliminary wear results.
    Burgess IC; Kolar M; Cunningham JL; Unsworth A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 9141889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: a probabilistic study.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Fields A; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2212-21. PubMed ID: 17004268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of contact pressures in tibial and patellar total knee components before and after service in vivo.
    McNamara JL; Collier JP; Mayor MB; Jensen RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):104-13. PubMed ID: 8119003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visualisation of tibiofemoral contact in total knee replacement using optical device.
    Krichen A; Ketata H; Elgasri S
    Knee; 2006 Jun; 13(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 16631371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mobile-bearing knee systems: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear and design issues.
    Greenwald AS; Heim CS
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():195-205. PubMed ID: 15948447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of stair descent loading on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear in a force-controlled knee simulator.
    Benson LC; DesJardins JD; Harman MK; LaBerge M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2002; 216(6):409-18. PubMed ID: 12502005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance of contemporary tibial polyethylene components.
    Crowninshield RD; Wimmer MA; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Aug; 21(5):754-61. PubMed ID: 16877165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrieval, experimental, and computational assessment of the performance of total knee replacements.
    Rawlinson JJ; Furman BD; Li S; Wright TM; Bartel DL
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1384-94. PubMed ID: 16705715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.