268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19133083)
1. Mechanical behaviour of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments in simulated clinical conditions: a computational study.
Necchi S; Taschieri S; Petrini L; Migliavacca F
Int Endod J; 2008 Nov; 41(11):939-49. PubMed ID: 19133083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.
Di Fiore PM; Genov KI; Komaroff E; Dasanayake AP; Lin L
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):502-9. PubMed ID: 16674746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of phase transformation on the torsional and bending properties of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Miyai K; Ebihara A; Hayashi Y; Doi H; Suda H; Yoneyama T
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16454792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Pecci R; Bedini R; Malagnino VA; Somma F
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):755-63. PubMed ID: 16948660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
Berutti E; Chiandussi G; Gaviglio I; Ibba A
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
Pruett JP; Clement DJ; Carnes DL
J Endod; 1997 Feb; 23(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 9220735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential scanning calorimetric studies of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments after simulated clinical use.
Brantley WA; Svec TA; Iijima M; Powers JM; Grentzer TH
J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):774-8. PubMed ID: 12470023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue and mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
Kuhn G; Jordan L
J Endod; 2002 Oct; 28(10):716-20. PubMed ID: 12398171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The LightSpeed system.
Barbakow F
Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Jan; 48(1):113-35. PubMed ID: 15066510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.
Bergmans L; Van Cleynenbreugel J; Wevers M; Lambrechts P
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):324-33. PubMed ID: 11803999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
