211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19133095)
21. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement.
Coldero LG; McHugh S; MacKenzie D; Saunders WP
Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):437-46. PubMed ID: 12059915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ex vivo evaluation of the effects of several root canal preparation techniques and irrigation regimens on a mixed microbial infection.
Nakamura VC; Cai S; Candeiro GT; Ferrari PH; Caldeira CL; Gavini G
Int Endod J; 2013 Mar; 46(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 22900749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.
Taneja S; Kumari M; Barua M; Dudeja C; Malik M
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25961619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Üreyen Kaya B; Erik CE; Sesli Çetin E; Köle M; Maden M
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29985531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
Pataky L; Iványi I; Grigár A; Fazekas A
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 12184424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques.
Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A
J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness of three instrumentation systems to remove Enterococcus faecalis from root canals.
Matos Neto M; Santos SS; Leão MV; Habitante SM; Rodrigues JR; Jorge AO
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 22211829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduction in bacterial counts in infected root canals after rotary or hand nickel-titanium instrumentation--a clinical study.
Rôças IN; Lima KC; Siqueira JF
Int Endod J; 2013 Jul; 46(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 23331179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bacterial reduction by extensive versus conservative root canal instrumentation in vitro.
Aydin C; Tunca YM; Senses Z; Baysallar M; Kayaoglu G; Ørstavik D
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Jun; 65(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 17514519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals.
Singla M; Aggarwal V; Logani A; Shah N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e105-10. PubMed ID: 20219574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative molecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in oval-shaped root canals by a single-file instrumentation technique.
Alves FR; Rôças IN; Almeida BM; Neves MA; Zoffoli J; Siqueira JF
Int Endod J; 2012 Sep; 45(9):871-7. PubMed ID: 22452547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
