These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19135777)

  • 1. Editorial comment on: Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
    Volpe A
    Eur Urol; 2009 Dec; 56(6):1012. PubMed ID: 19135777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
    Cho HJ; Kim SJ; Ha US; Hong SH; Kim JC; Choi YJ; Hwang TK
    Eur Urol; 2009 Dec; 56(6):1006-12. PubMed ID: 19135776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial comment.
    Wood CG
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1315-6; discussion 1316. PubMed ID: 20171660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editorial comment.
    Kattan MW
    Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1371; author reply 1371-2. PubMed ID: 20513496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial comment on: Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Kirkali Z
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):460. PubMed ID: 18692949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editorial comment on: Prognosis value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
    Russo P
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):459. PubMed ID: 18692952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of postoperative C-reactive protein level on recurrence and prognosis in patients with N0M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
    Ito K; Yoshii H; Sato A; Kuroda K; Asakuma J; Horiguchi A; Sumitomo M; Asano T
    J Urol; 2011 Aug; 186(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 21679988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma.
    Jeong IG; Jeong CW; Hong SK; Kwak C; Lee E; Lee SE
    Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 16566981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic relevance of capsular involvement and collecting system invasion in stage I and II renal cell carcinoma.
    Klatte T; Chung J; Leppert JT; Lam JS; Pantuck AJ; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS
    BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):821-4. PubMed ID: 17244281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microscopic venous invasion in renal cell carcinoma as a predictor of recurrence after radical surgery.
    Ishimura T; Sakai I; Hara I; Eto H; Miyake H
    Int J Urol; 2004 May; 11(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 15147540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined renal sinus fat and perinephric fat renal cell carcinoma invasion has a worse prognosis than either alone.
    Kresowik TP; Johnson MT; Joudi FN
    J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20478592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does tumor size or microvascular invasion affect prognosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma?
    Miyagawa T; Shimazui T; Hinotsu S; Oikawa T; Sekido N; Miyanaga N; Kawai K; Akaza H
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Mar; 37(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 17360737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial comment on: Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery.
    Eggener S
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):472. PubMed ID: 19359087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial comment on: Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery.
    Russo P
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):472-3. PubMed ID: 19359086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative prognostic nomogram (probability table) for renal cell carcinoma based on TNM classification.
    Kanao K; Mizuno R; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Ohigashi T; Nakashima J; Oya M
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):480-5; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19100568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial comment on: external validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
    Blute ML
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 19062158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial comment on: External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
    Giannarini G; Autorino R
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):109-10. PubMed ID: 19062156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extension.
    Klatte T; Pantuck AJ; Riggs SB; Kleid MD; Shuch B; Zomorodian N; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1189-95; discussion 1195. PubMed ID: 17698087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Renal sinus fat invasion in pT3a clear cell renal cell carcinoma affects outcomes of patients without nodal involvement or distant metastases.
    Bertini R; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Strada E; Petralia G; Pasta A; Matloob R; Sozzi F; Da Pozzo L; Colombo R; Guazzoni G; Doglioni C; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
    J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2027-32. PubMed ID: 19286201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prognostic criteria in renal cell cancer].
    Ganzen TN; Aliaev IuG
    Arkh Patol; 1986; 48(7):19-23. PubMed ID: 3753246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.