288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19135816)
1. Impact of image noise levels, scout scan dose and lens shield on image quality and radiation exposure in z-axis dose-modulated neck MSCT on 16- and 64-slice Toshiba Aquilion scanners.
Bauknecht HC; Jach C; Bohner G; Meyer H; Scheurig C; Siebert E; Klingebiel R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):439-43. PubMed ID: 19135816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner.
Weidemann J; Stamm G; Galanski M; Keberle M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 18182264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
Coursey C; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Greenberg SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W54-61. PubMed ID: 18094273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced radiation exposure of the female breast during low-dose chest CT using organ-based tube current modulation and a bismuth shield: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Kim YK; Sung YM; Choi JH; Kim EY; Kim HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 23436842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT.
Leswick DA; Hunt MM; Webster ST; Fladeland DA
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):572-80. PubMed ID: 18780826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Organ-based dose current modulation and thyroid shields: techniques of radiation dose reduction for neck CT.
Hoang JK; Yoshizumi TT; Choudhury KR; Nguyen GB; Toncheva G; Gafton AR; Eastwood JD; Lowry C; Hurwitz LM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1132-8. PubMed ID: 22528904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and global reduction of tube current for dose reduction to the eye at head CT.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 22190658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head.
Reimann AJ; Davison C; Bjarnason T; Thakur Y; Kryzmyk K; Mayo J; Nicolaou S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22592620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a Net Dose-Reducing Organ-Based Tube Current Modulation Technique: Comparison With Standard Dose and Bismuth-Shielded Acquisitions.
Lambert JW; Gould RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 27058461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure.
Hofmann E; Schmid M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Sep; 75(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 25158951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CONSORT-compliant prospective randomized controlled trial: radiation dose reducing in computed tomography using an additional lateral scout view combined with automatic tube current modulation: Phantom and patient study.
Peng W; Li Z; Xia C; Guo Y; Zhang J; Zhang K; Li L; Zhao F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7324. PubMed ID: 28746180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Organ dose calculation in CT based on scout image data and automatic image registration.
Kortesniemi M; Salli E; Seuri R
Acta Radiol; 2012 Oct; 53(8):908-13. PubMed ID: 22919053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation dose reduction to the eye lens in head CT using tungsten functional paper and organ-based tube current modulation.
Kosaka H; Monzen H; Amano M; Tamura M; Hattori S; Kono Y; Nishimura Y
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 124():108814. PubMed ID: 31945674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of dose-reduced scan protocols on cardiac coronary image quality with 64-row MDCT: a cardiac phantom study.
Fei X; Du X; Li P; Liao J; Shen Y; Li K
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17765422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems.
Martin CJ; Sookpeng S
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]