These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19135854)

  • 1. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Sáenz-Lechón N; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19135854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual and acoustic assessment of voice pathology and the efficacy of endolaryngeal phonomicrosurgery.
    Uloza V; Saferis V; Uloziene I
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15766859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
    Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral noise estimation in the evaluation of pathological voice.
    Murphy PJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17114131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of a glottal related harmonics-to-noise ratio and spectral tilt as indicators of glottal noise in synthesized and human voice signals.
    Murphy PJ; McGuigan KG; Walsh M; Colreavy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1642-52. PubMed ID: 18345852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):327-39. PubMed ID: 11324655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach.
    Umapathy K; Krishnan S; Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 15759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice pathology detection based eon short-term jitter estimations in running speech.
    Vasilakis M; Stylianou Y
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(3):153-70. PubMed ID: 19571550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices.
    Dehqan A; Ansari H; Bakhtiar M
    J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 19230602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The turbulent noise ratio: an estimation of noise power of the breathy voice using PARCOR analysis.
    Mori K; Blaugrund SM; Yu JD
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Feb; 104(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8302117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. H-Index: a new measure of glottal efficiency for the pathologic voice.
    Shoji K; Regenbogen E; Yu JD; Blaugrund SM
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Oct; 102(10):1113-7. PubMed ID: 1405962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological likelihood index as a measurement of the degree of voice normality and perceived hoarseness.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Gómez-Vilda P; Cruz-Roldán F; Blanco-Velasco M; Fraile R
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):667-77. PubMed ID: 20207107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.
    Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Šaferis V; Uloza V
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 276(6):1737-1745. PubMed ID: 31016388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective voice quality analysis before and after onset of unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
    Hartl DM; Hans S; Vaissière J; Riquet M; Brasnu DF
    J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 11575632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):469-85. PubMed ID: 10757697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.