These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19137746)
21. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Nordholm S MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe. Solomon D Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. When the barbarians came. Francis D J La State Med Soc; 1973 Apr; 125(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 4691967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The women of Roe v. Wade. Glendon MA Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Politics and protecting human life: "private" versus "public" actions. Lomanno MP Ethics Medics; 2003 Oct; 28(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 16206475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Government in medicine. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2195. PubMed ID: 17452438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A matter for the heart: the 30th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Origins; 2002 Nov; 32(24):398-9. PubMed ID: 12737182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reading the abortion ruling. Tolson J US News World Rep; 2007 Apr; 142(15):36. PubMed ID: 17491476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion in America: is compromise possible? Hodges SA J Legal Stud; 1999-2000; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. What Overturning Roe v Wade May Mean for Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the US. Cohen IG; Daar J; Adashi EY JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):15-16. PubMed ID: 35666541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion law should align with evidence from neuroscience. Perry C; Felsen G Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):49-51. PubMed ID: 21161844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion. Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again? Forde C Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]