613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19138616)
1. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
Stumpel LJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application and success of two stereolithographic surgical guide systems for implant placement with immediate loading.
Abboud M; Wahl G; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):634-43. PubMed ID: 22616058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Pişkin B; Özdemir T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 22235792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
Lal K; White GS; Morea DN; Wright RF
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
