These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19138636)
1. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures. Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Naitoh M; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Gotoh K; Ariji E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 19071039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and osteometric examination in preoperative assessment of the proximity of the mandibular canal to the apices of the teeth. Adibi S; Paknahad M Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 55(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 27842729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining position of the inferior alveolar nerve via anatomical dissection and micro-computed tomography in preparation for dental implants. Massey ND; Galil KA; Wilson TD J Can Dent Assoc; 2013; 79():d39. PubMed ID: 23920072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study. Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull. Kamburoğlu K; Kolsuz E; Kurt H; Kiliç C; Özen T; Paksoy CS J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):787-93. PubMed ID: 20857166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography. Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Horasan S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 20100921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of 3 different tracing methods based on cone beam computed tomography in determining the anatomical position of the mandibular canal. Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ; Mulder J; Rangel FA; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):811-7. PubMed ID: 20036043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam and multi-slice computed tomographies for evaluation of mandibular canal location in dry mandibles. Naser AZ; Mehr BB Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2013 Jan; 10(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 23878558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Naitoh M; Hirukawa A; Katsumata A; Ariji E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19250241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Naitoh M; Nakahara K; Suenaga Y; Gotoh K; Kondo S; Ariji E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e25-31. PubMed ID: 20123365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery. Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]