142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19139434)
1. Sequential testing approach as an efficient and easier alternative for the validation of new predictive technologies in the clinic.
Beam CA; Gao W; Macias V; Liang W; Kajdacsy Balla A
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(7):1087-90. PubMed ID: 19139434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The probability of Gleason score upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy can be accurately predicted.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 19389085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of pretreatment nomograms for predicting indolent prostate cancer: efficacy in contemporary urological practice.
Dong F; Kattan MW; Steyerberg EW; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Schröder FH; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):150-4; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 18485398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inventory of prostate cancer predictive tools.
Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Margulis V; Kattan MW
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 May; 18(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 18382238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature.
Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Kattan MW
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jul; 14(14):4400-7. PubMed ID: 18628454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a nomogram to predict disease progression following salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.
Moreira DM; Jayachandran J; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Stephenson AJ; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1452-6. PubMed ID: 19466946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive models before and after radical prostatectomy.
Capitanio U; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Scattoni V
Prostate; 2010 Sep; 70(12):1371-8. PubMed ID: 20623635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Nomogram as predictive model in clinical practice].
Ohori Tatsuo Gondo And Riu Hamada M; Gondo T; Hamada R
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2009 Jun; 36(6):901-6. PubMed ID: 19542708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of nomograms for personalized decision-analytic recommendations.
Fu AZ; Cantor SB; Kattan MW
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19648535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The current state of brachytherapy nomograms for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Nguyen CT; Zelefsky MJ; Kattan MW
Cancer; 2009 Jul; 115(13 Suppl):3121-7. PubMed ID: 19544540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of graft survival of living-donor kidney transplantation: nomograms or artificial neural networks?
Akl A; Ismail AM; Ghoneim M
Transplantation; 2008 Nov; 86(10):1401-6. PubMed ID: 19034010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External validation and head-to-head comparison of Japanese and Western prostate biopsy nomograms using Japanese data sets.
Utsumi T; Kawamura K; Suzuki H; Kamiya N; Imamoto T; Miura J; Ueda T; Maruoka M; Sekita N; Mikami K; Ichikawa T
Int J Urol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):416-9. PubMed ID: 19226358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Current validity of nomograms for prostate cancer staging].
Fernando AB; Sanz G; Esteban LM; Sanz MJ; Martínez PG; de Jalón AG; Frago PS; Losa CA; Sanz LA
Arch Esp Urol; 2006 Dec; 59(10):989-1000. PubMed ID: 17283712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools.
Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Roehrborn CG; Kattan MW
Cancer; 2008 Dec; 113(11):3075-99. PubMed ID: 18823041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting likelihood of having four or more positive nodes in patient with sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer: a nomogram validation study.
Unal B; Gur AS; Beriwal S; Tang G; Johnson R; Ahrendt G; Bonaventura M; Soran A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1035-40. PubMed ID: 19327916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostogram predicted brachytherapy outcomes are not universally accurate: an analysis based on the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with (125)iodine brachytherapy.
Frank SJ; Levy LB; Kuban DA; Lee AK; Kudchadker RJ; Bruno TL; van Vulpen M; Swanson DA
J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1658-63; discussion 1663-4. PubMed ID: 19233434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A graphical device to represent the outcomes of a logistic regression analysis.
Kranse R; Roobol M; Schröder FH
Prostate; 2008 Nov; 68(15):1674-80. PubMed ID: 18712715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
