These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19139968)

  • 41. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.
    Sandiford NA; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):186-192. PubMed ID: 27672012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
    Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impaction allograft with cement for the revision of the femoral component. A minimum 39-month follow-up study with the use of the Exeter stem in Asian hips.
    Yim SJ; Kim MY; Suh YS
    Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 16964487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component: laboratory studies and clinical validation.
    Höstner J; Hultmark P; Kärrholm J; Malchau H; Tveit M
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan; 16(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 11172274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup.
    Stigbrand H; Gustafsson O; Ullmark G
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):815-822. PubMed ID: 29153632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement.
    Slooff TJ; Buma P; Schreurs BW; Schimmel JW; Huiskes R; Gardeniers J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Mar; (324):108-15. PubMed ID: 8595745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Revision total hip arthroplasty in the deficient femur with a proximal load-bearing prosthesis.
    Head WC; Wagner RA; Emerson RH; Malinin TI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jan; (298):119-26. PubMed ID: 8118966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
    Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impacted cancellous graft plus cement in hip revision.
    Cabanela ME; Trousdale RT; Berry DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):175-82. PubMed ID: 14646715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: allograft bone packing following extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Chassin EP; Silverton CD; Berzins A; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 9458251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cancellous impaction grafting in femoral revision THA.
    Padgett DE; Kinkel S
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e482-4. PubMed ID: 21902138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impaction allografting of the proximal femur using a Charnley-type stem: a cement mantle analysis.
    Masterson EL; Busch CA; Duncan CP; Drabu K
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jan; 14(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9926954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cemented impaction grafting with moulded intramedullary mesh for femoral stem revision--long-term results.
    Girard J; Riera P; Pearce O; Duquennoy A; Migaud H
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 21279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Femoral reconstruction with impacted macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic in revision hip arthroplasty].
    Nich C; Bizot P; Nizard R; Sedel L
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Jun; 92(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 16948461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bone graft materials in fixation of orthopaedic implants in sheep.
    Babiker H
    Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):B4680. PubMed ID: 23809979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Femoral component loosening in hip arthroplasty. Cadaver study of subsidence and hoop strain.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Kotzar G; Stulberg BN
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Oct; 58(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 3425274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.
    Arumugam G; Nanjayan SK; Quah C; Wraighte P; Howard P
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Dec; 25(8):1279-84. PubMed ID: 26399609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Calcium phosphate cement composites in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Speirs AD; Oxland TR; Masri BA; Poursartip A; Duncan CP
    Biomaterials; 2005 Dec; 26(35):7310-8. PubMed ID: 16023190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.