488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19140496)
1. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort.
Stirrup OT; Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Thilaganathan B;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 25052857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.
Drukker L; Droste R; Chatelain P; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31763735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal size charts for a population from Cali, Colombia: sonographic measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23804344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Z-scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve.
Sananes N; Guigue V; Kohler M; Bouffet N; Cancellier M; Hornecker F; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Schmerber E; Tanghe M; Nisand I; Favre R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 19731264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
