607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19140552)
1. P4P lessons learned.
Dominik D
Health Data Manag; 2008 Dec; 16(12):56. PubMed ID: 19140552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Achieving process innovation: Washington hospital improves capacity, quality and nets CMS, P4P honors.
Couture ES; Fisher BA
Healthc Exec; 2009; 24(2):24-6, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 19326744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. P4P--the next generation. Providers need to be involved in designing new incentive payment programs.
Norling R
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(46):20. PubMed ID: 17153788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "P4P"--a force to be reckoned with.
Kahn C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):12. PubMed ID: 16075769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities.
Raths D
Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Providers: more pay in P4P. CMS says higher incentive opportunities possible.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Sep; 38(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 18810821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. P4P money slow to come groups disagree with CMS' methodology, results.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2008 Aug; 38(33):8-9. PubMed ID: 18780450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Response is mixed on CMS value-based purchasing paper.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Jul; 14(7):73-6. PubMed ID: 17784719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do demonstration project's numbers really validate P4P? Observers say other factors play role in improvement.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Feb; 13(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 16544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. P4P: program design is key.
LaPorte M
Provider; 2007 Jan; 33(1):22-4, 26-30, 32-3. PubMed ID: 18198573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Paying for performance. Insurers expected to follow WellPoint's lead.
McKinney M
Mod Healthc; 2011 May; 41(21):10. PubMed ID: 21714443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. CMS dangling carrot. Up to 50,000 dollars available in P4P plan.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(43):33. PubMed ID: 17128588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Making PQRI work in a nephrology practice.
Owens H
Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Jun; 23(7):16-8. PubMed ID: 19585806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Dollars for quality?
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2008 Oct; 104(10):35-9. PubMed ID: 19009461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The long run. As the P4P race continues, providers integrate EBM with data-gathering systems to cross the finish line.
Hagland M
Healthc Inform; 2007 Jul; 24(7):36-9. PubMed ID: 17695822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(37):9. PubMed ID: 12375411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. For this hospital, money is secondary.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Jul; 12(7):76-7. PubMed ID: 16021976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
