425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19140906)
1. The effects of rate-adaptive atrial pacing versus ventricular backup pacing on exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Passman R; Banthia S; Galvez D; Sheldon T; Kadish A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19140906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial: rationale, design, results, clinical implications and lessons for future trials.
Wilkoff BL;
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 15071277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of right ventricular pacing sites on exercise capacity during ventricular rate regularization in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.
Tse HF; Siu CW; Lau CP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 32(12):1536-42. PubMed ID: 19825009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].
Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left ventricular diastolic filling pattern predicts cardiopulmonary determinants of functional capacity in patients with congestive heart failure.
Parthenakis FI; Kanoupakis EM; Kochiadakis GE; Skalidis EI; Mezilis NE; Simantirakis EN; Kanakaraki MK; Vardas PE
Am Heart J; 2000 Aug; 140(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 10925352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biventricular versus conventional right ventricular stimulation for patients with standard pacing indication and left ventricular dysfunction: the Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE).
Kindermann M; Hennen B; Jung J; Geisel J; Böhm M; Fröhlig G
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(10):1927-37. PubMed ID: 16697307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Benefits and limits of single chamber atrial pacing with adaptive rate].
Pouillot C; Mabo P; Lelong B; Cazeau S; Paillard F; de Place C; Daubert JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Nov; 83(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 2125194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevention of ventricular desynchronization by permanent para-Hisian pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation: a crossover, blinded, randomized study versus apical right ventricular pacing.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Magnani A; Francalacci G; Piccinino C; Plebani L; Marino P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(10):1938-45. PubMed ID: 16697308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.
Cazeau S; Leclercq C; Lavergne T; Walker S; Varma C; Linde C; Garrigue S; Kappenberger L; Haywood GA; Santini M; Bailleul C; Daubert JC;
N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(12):873-80. PubMed ID: 11259720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].
Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M
Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results.
Victor F; Mabo P; Mansour H; Pavin D; Kabalu G; de Place C; Leclercq C; Daubert JC
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 16643392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M
Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effects of ventricular demand and dual-chamber pacing models on the long-term clinical outcome and cardiac remodeling in patients with symptomatic bradycardia].
Dong YX; Guo M; Yang YZ; Gao LJ; Cha YM; Xie ZZ; Zhang SL; Sun YH; Wang YQ; Xia YL; Boodhna J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(30):2103-7. PubMed ID: 22093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DDD vs. VVI pacing in patients aged over 75 years with complete heart block: a double-blind crossover comparison.
Channon KM; Hargreaves MR; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Q J Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 8208915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between CD34+ and exercise capacity, functional class, quality of life and norepinephrine in heart failure patients.
Carvalho VO; Ruiz MA; Bocchi EA; Carvalho VO; Guimarães GV
Cardiol J; 2009; 16(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 19753521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with bradycardia].
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Mizumaki K; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Sasayama S
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):503-12. PubMed ID: 1339809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Severe atrioventricular decoupling, uncoupling, and ventriculoatrial coupling during enhanced atrial pacing: incidence, mechanisms, and implications for minimizing right ventricular pacing in ICD patients.
Sweeney MO; Ellenbogen KA; Tang AS; Johnson J; Belk P; Sheldon T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1175-80. PubMed ID: 18554192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
