361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19141882)
1. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo study on the imaging performance of powder Lu2SiO5:Ce phosphor screens under x-ray excitation: comparison with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1724-33. PubMed ID: 17555254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overestimations in zero frequency DQE of x-ray imaging converters assessed by Monte Carlo techniques based on the study of energy impartation events.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4440-50. PubMed ID: 21859045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of imaging performance of a taper optics CCD; FReLoN' camera designed for medical imaging.
Coan P; Peterzol A; Fiedler S; Ponchut C; Labiche JC; Bravin A
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2006 May; 13(Pt 3):260-70. PubMed ID: 16645252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling granular phosphor screens by Monte Carlo methods.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4502-14. PubMed ID: 17278802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of gamma camera systems: a Monte Carlo study.
Eriksson I; Starck SA; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):219-27. PubMed ID: 20172935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anisotropic imaging performance in indirect x-ray imaging detectors.
Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Sempau J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2698-713. PubMed ID: 16967568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.
Hajdok G; Yao J; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3601-20. PubMed ID: 17089826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert.
Park SJ; Rogers WL; Clinthorne NH
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4653-77. PubMed ID: 17634656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MANTIS: combined x-ray, electron and optical Monte Carlo simulations of indirect radiation imaging systems.
Badano A; Sempau J
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1545-61. PubMed ID: 16510962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in evaluating the performance of gamma camera systems.
Starck SA; Båth M; Carlsson S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1601-9. PubMed ID: 15798346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
Liaparinos P; Bliznakova K
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
