BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19142629)

  • 1. Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.
    Fowler SC; Pinkston J; Vorontsova E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Jun; 204(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 19142629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acute effects of d-amphetamine on the differential reinforcement of low-rate (DRL) schedule behavior in the rat: comparison with selective dopamine receptor antagonists.
    Liao RM; Cheng RK
    Chin J Physiol; 2005 Mar; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15973966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methylphenidate and d-amphetamine: effects and interactions with alphamethyltyrosine and tetrabenazine on DRL performance in rats.
    Seiden LS; Andresen J; MacPhail RC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Apr; 10(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 572553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effects of D-amphetamine on FI and DRL schedule performance of self-stimulating rats.
    Nalwa V; Rao PS
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1984; 11(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 6744685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dopamine receptor antagonists reverse amphetamine-induced behavioral alteration on a differential reinforcement for low-rate (DRL) operant task in the rat.
    Cheng RK; Liao RM
    Chin J Physiol; 2007 Apr; 50(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 17608145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitization to amphetamine on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-s schedule.
    Balcells-Olivero M; Richards JB; Seiden LS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Oct; 133(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 9361325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interresponse time changes as a function of water deprivation and amphetamine.
    Brown BM; Seiden LS
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1975 May; 193(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 1142113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impaired DRL 30 performance during amphetamine withdrawal.
    Peterson JD; Wolf ME; White FJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 143(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 12842301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spontaneous activity as a contingency-controlled behavior within an operant context: alprazolam concentration-effect relations after subcutaneous administration in rats.
    Simpao A; Sun L; Falk JL; Lau CE
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 May; 155(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 11432689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule.
    Mendrek A; Blaha CD; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Feb; 135(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 9539267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose-dependent effects but not sensitization of DRL 45-s performance by oral d-amphetamine with cumulative- and repeated-dosing regimens.
    Lobarinas E; Falk JL
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Dec; 10(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 10780289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.
    McClure GY; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baseline behavior, but not sensitivity to stimulant drugs, differs among spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar-Kyoto, and Sprague-Dawley rat strains.
    Ferguson SA; Paule MG; Cada A; Fogle CM; Gray EP; Berry KJ
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2007; 29(5):547-61. PubMed ID: 17689921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DRL interresponse-time distributions: quantification by peak deviation analysis.
    Richards JB; Sabol KE; Seiden LS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):361-85. PubMed ID: 8409824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal regulation of children with autism spectrum disorder exposed to a differential-reinforcement-of low-rates schedule.
    Gaucher M; Forget J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):515-529. PubMed ID: 32201952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of dopamine depletions in the medial prefrontal cortex on DRL performance and motor activity in the rat.
    Sokolowski JD; Salamone JD
    Brain Res; 1994 Apr; 642(1-2):20-8. PubMed ID: 8032881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different effects of 5-HT receptor agonists on operant response in rats under DRL 10-s and DRL 30-s schedules.
    Liao RM; Chang YH
    Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B; 2001 Oct; 25(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 11699570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist and antagonist on timing impulsivity induced by d-amphetamine in a differential reinforcement of low-rate response task in male rats.
    Chen SF; Hsu WC; Lu XY; Chuang CY; Liao RM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2022 May; 239(5):1459-1473. PubMed ID: 34741633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential effects of dopamine receptor subtype-specific agonists with respect to operant behavior maintained on a differential reinforcement of low-rate responding (DRL) schedule.
    Chiang FK; Cheng RK; Liao RM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2015 Mar; 130():67-76. PubMed ID: 25584855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of caffeine on DRL performance in the mouse.
    Webb D; Levine TE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Jul; 9(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 704655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.