These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1914389)

  • 1. Evaluation of magnification and paddle compression techniques in the assessment of mammographic screening detected abnormalities.
    Hayes R; Michell M; Nunnerley HB
    Clin Radiol; 1991 Sep; 44(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 1914389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of spot compression-magnification and tangential views in mammographic evaluation of palpable breast masses.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 1523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions.
    Cornford EJ; Turnbull AE; James JJ; Tsang R; Akram T; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Tennant SL; Bagnall MJ; Puri S; Ball GR; Chen Y; Jones V
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150735. PubMed ID: 26559441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectrum of abnormal mammographic findings and their predictive value for malignancy in Singaporean women from a population screening trial.
    Sng KW; Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde C; Tan KP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Jul; 29(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 11056775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of lesions detected by mammography. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists.
    CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 9484273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. With the Advent of Tomosynthesis in the Workup of Mammographic Abnormality, is Spot Compression Mammography Now Obsolete? An Initial Clinical Experience.
    Ni Mhuircheartaigh N; Coffey L; Fleming H; O' Doherty A; McNally S
    Breast J; 2017 Sep; 23(5):509-518. PubMed ID: 28252233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
    Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the mammographic lesion.
    Osborne JM; Robert D
    Australas Radiol; 1989 Nov; 33(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 2633731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion.
    Kalbhen CL; Kezdi-Rogus PC; Dowling MP; Flisak ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9423612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma.
    DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Shaffer K; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Rolfs AT
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):341-3. PubMed ID: 8596828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term recall for 'probably benign' mammographic lesions detected in a three yearly screening programme.
    Dawson JS; Wilson AR
    Clin Radiol; 1994 Jun; 49(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 8045062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn?
    Burrell HC; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE
    Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11384136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression.
    Berkowitz JE; Gatewood OM; Gayler BW
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):369-71. PubMed ID: 2704800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing emphasis in breast diagnosis: the surgeon's role in evaluating mammographic abnormalities.
    Sterns EE
    J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 184(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 9060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of Siemens digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard supplementary mammography for the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue abnormalities: a multi-reader study.
    Whelehan P; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Vinnicombe SJ; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Hapca A; Gray R; Jenkin M; Lowry K; Oeppen R; Reilly M; Stahnke M; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):95.e9-95.e15. PubMed ID: 27737763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early experience with needle localization and biopsy of mammographic lesions.
    Bird D; Hart S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 May; 60(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 2334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.