363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19144380)
1. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does site specific labeling of sextant biopsy cores predict the site of extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy surgical specimen.
Taneja SS; Penson DF; Epelbaum A; Handler T; Lepor H
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1352-7; discussion 1357-8. PubMed ID: 10492195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostatectomy and biopsies that show more than two different Gleason scores in positive cores.
Park HK; Choe G; Byun SS; Lee HW; Lee SE; Lee E
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16413344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the number of core biopsies of the prostate on predicting Gleason score of prostate cancer.
Thickman D; Speers WC; Philpott PJ; Shapiro H
J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 8648769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
Fine SW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.
Brimo F; Schultz L; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 20478583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
Karram S; Trock BJ; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.
Pinthus JH; Witkos M; Fleshner NE; Sweet J; Evans A; Jewett MA; Krahn M; Alibhai S; Trachtenberg J
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):979-84; discussion 984. PubMed ID: 16890675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists].
Kato T; Nakano M; Uno H; Seike K; Kojima K; Kubota Y; Goto T; Yamamoto N; Ehara H; Kanimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Deguchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 19048927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on needle biopsy predicts greater tumour volume on radical prostatectomy.
Ranaweera M; Samaratunga H; Duffy D; Klopfer K; Brunelli M; Martignoni G; Delahunt B
Pathology; 2011 Dec; 43(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 22002115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the percentage of positive biopsy cores on the further stratification of primary grade 3 and grade 4 Gleason score 7 tumors in radical prostatectomy patients.
Vira MA; Tomaszewski JE; Hwang WT; D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Vanarsdalen K; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1015-9. PubMed ID: 16286115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
