These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19144540)

  • 1. On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.
    Paulitzki JR; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 19144540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading aloud and the question of intent.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1298-310. PubMed ID: 22868215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1303-23. PubMed ID: 17154774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical processing while deciding what task to perform: reading aloud in the context of the task set paradigm.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1594-603. PubMed ID: 21911302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+.
    Ziegler JC; Perry C; Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19210104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It's what's on the outside that matters: an advantage for external features in children's word recognition.
    Webb TM; Beech JR; Mayall KM; Andrews AS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16530781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
    Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading aloud and lexical decision in neglect dyslexia patients: a dissociation.
    Arduino LS; Burani C; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):877-85. PubMed ID: 12667524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.
    Ozubko JD; Macleod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1543-7. PubMed ID: 20804284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: evidence from voice assimilation in French.
    Snoeren ND; Seguí J; Hallé PA
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):512-21. PubMed ID: 18400217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.
    Küper K; Heil M
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Apr; 453(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 19356603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.