214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19144870)
1. Investigation of the dermal sensitizing potential of traditional medical extracts in local lymph node assays.
Lv L; Yan GY; Zhao YL; He XJ; Jiang X; Zhuo YQ; Wang YL; Wang L; Cen XB
Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2009 Mar; 234(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 19144870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Miller CM; Ridder GM
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1999 Sep; 159(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 10495778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions.
Homey B; von Schilling C; Blümel J; Schuppe HC; Ruzicka T; Ahr HJ; Lehmann P; Vohr HW
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 153(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 9875302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunophenotyping does not improve predictivity of the local lymph node assay in mice.
Strauss V; Kolle SN; Honarvar N; Dammann M; Groeters S; Faulhammer F; Landsiedel R; van Ravenzwaay B
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 35(4):434-45. PubMed ID: 25186098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site.
Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of differential gene expression in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to sensitizers and irritants.
Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Ryu DY
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Feb; 177(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18242016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intracellular expression of cytokines and granzyme B in auricular lymph nodes draining skin exposed to irritants and sensitizers.
Ku HO; Jeong SH; Kang HG; Pyo HM; Cho JH; Son SW; Kim HR; Lee KJ; Ryu DY
Toxicology; 2008 Sep; 250(2-3):116-23. PubMed ID: 18652873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. B220 analysis with the local lymph node assay: proposal for a more flexible prediction model.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Lalko J; Api AM
J Appl Toxicol; 2007; 27(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 17541942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry in non-radioisotopic murine lymph node assay using bromodeoxyuridine.
Jung KM; Bae IH; Kim BH; Kim WK; Chung JH; Park YH; Lim KM
Toxicol Lett; 2010 Feb; 192(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 19879932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of auricular lymph node cell lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production as non-radioactive endpoints during murine contact allergy.
Ulker OC; Atak A; Ates I; Karakaya A
J Immunotoxicol; 2011 Jun; 8(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 21275877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reduced local lymph node assay: the impact of group size.
Ryan CA; Chaney JG; Kern PS; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA; Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17879259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of the sensitising potential of various textile dyes using a biphasic murine local lymph node assay.
Ahuja V; Platzek T; Fink H; Sonnenburg A; Stahlmann R
Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):709-18. PubMed ID: 20585758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a local lymph node assay based on ex vivo interleukin-2 production.
Azam P; Peiffer JL; Ourlin JC; Bonnet PA; Tissier MH; Vian L; Fabre I
Toxicology; 2005 Jan; 206(2):285-98. PubMed ID: 15588920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divergent immunological responses following glutaraldehyde exposure.
Azadi S; Klink KJ; Meade BJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2004 May; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15126069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
