These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19145012)

  • 1. Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.
    Lanthier SN; Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19145012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of letter features in visual-word recognition: Evidence from a delayed segment technique.
    Rosa E; Perea M; Enneson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():133-42. PubMed ID: 27289422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of invariant line junctions in object and visual word recognition.
    Szwed M; Cohen L; Qiao E; Dehaene S
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 19200808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?
    Davis CJ; Bowers JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):923-41. PubMed ID: 15462631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic interference from objects both in and out of a scene context.
    Mathis KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):171-82. PubMed ID: 11827079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving exterior letters of words: differential influences of letter-fragment and non-letter-fragment masks.
    Jordon TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):512-30. PubMed ID: 7790831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and proprioceptive recognition of cursive letters in young children.
    Vinter A; Chartrel E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 18599004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multistream model of visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Lien MC; Kaut KP; Canfield A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 19304618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Context-dependent similarity effects in letter recognition.
    Kinoshita S; Robidoux S; Guilbert D; Norris D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1458-64. PubMed ID: 25855201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not?
    Koriat A; Norman J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 2522525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual versus postperceptual mediation of visual context effects: evidence from the letter-superiority effect.
    Reingold EM; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Feb; 53(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8433915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From letters to words: procedures for word recognition in letter-by-letter reading.
    Rapcsak SZ; Rubens AB; Laguna JF
    Brain Lang; 1990 May; 38(4):504-14. PubMed ID: 2375979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.
    McCann RS; Folk CL; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1015-29. PubMed ID: 1431741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 528961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.
    Inhoff AW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 2353591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.